What do you want?

I’m doing a bit of “audience testing” – if you all could request specific information in a book about collaboration 2.0 – anything at all – what would you like to see? I’m not promising I’ll include everything (it’s more of a booklet than a book so space is limited…), but I’d love to hear what you all are interested in and what would make you think this is a non-pass-upable bit of reading!

Last 5 Posts

  • 09/02/2010: Screen and distractions
  • 09/01/2010: Lifestream Event
  • 09/01/2010: Lifestream Event
  • 08/31/2010: links for 2010-08-31
  • 08/31/2010: Lifestream Event
  • View Comments to “What do you want?”

    1. Jodie Borgerding Says:

      This might be out of scope, but something about how to convince inexperienced librarians that 2.0 is the way to go. It’s not a fad that is going away soon.

    2. Robin Says:

      No, I don’t think that is out of scope. I’d consider that more of a meta-direction. While I’m writing my specific details, I can keep in mind that this is a possible use of the report – something for me to think about while I’m writing it. Thanks, Jodie!

    3. Jodie Borgerding Says:

      This might be out of scope, but something about how to convince inexperienced librarians that 2.0 is the way to go. It’s not a fad that is going away soon.

    4. Robin Says:

      No, I don’t think that is out of scope. I’d consider that more of a meta-direction. While I’m writing my specific details, I can keep in mind that this is a possible use of the report – something for me to think about while I’m writing it. Thanks, Jodie!

    5. tab Says:

      I have to agree with Jodie. Convincing other librarians that it’s important would be the first step in people like me getting to implement things I am DYING to use in my library!

    6. tab Says:

      I have to agree with Jodie. Convincing other librarians that it’s important would be the first step in people like me getting to implement things I am DYING to use in my library!

    Leave a Reply

    blog comments powered by Disqus